<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>PoliWatch - Political Meanings</title>
        <link>http://poliwatch.org/</link>
        <description>Headlines only scratch the surface! </description>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 14:35:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
        
        <item>
            <title>China: Lessons for America and The West</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="chinamap.gif" src="http://poliwatch.org/images/chinamap.gif" width="237" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" /></span>Ever heard of Vertical Democracy? Did you know America's democracy is termed a horizontal democracy? If not, you are missing out on world history in the making, as America will, by its political structure, lose ground against China. I highly recommend to those who wish to catch up on this history in the making, and peer into the future, John and Doris Naisbitt's new book, <a href="http://www.harpercollins.com/books/9780061859441/Chinas_Megatrends/index.aspx" target="blank">China's Megatrends, The 8 Pillars of a New Society</a>. </p>]]></description>
            <link>http://poliwatch.org/2010/03/06/china_lessons_for_america_and.php</link>
            <guid>http://poliwatch.org/2010/03/06/china_lessons_for_america_and.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Economy</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Foreign Policy</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Status of American Politics</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Chiang Kai-shek</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">China</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">communists</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">democracy</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Deng Xiaoping</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">economic future</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">economy</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Mao Zedung</category>
            
            <pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 14:35:00 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Health Care Summit: Politics as Usual </title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="H-Care-Summit.jpg" src="http://poliwatch.org/images/H-Care-Summit.jpg" width="512" height="217" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" /></span>The Health Care Summit with Pres. Obama and select Congressional individuals of the Donkey and Elephant persuasion, was obviously well prepared for by both sides. Each had their scripts well crafted, and lines rehearsed like veteran Shakespearian actors. It was as predicted, political theater at its worst. </p>]]></description>
            <link>http://poliwatch.org/2010/02/26/health_care_summit_politics_as.php</link>
            <guid>http://poliwatch.org/2010/02/26/health_care_summit_politics_as.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Health Care</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">health care summit</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Obama</category>
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 02:21:28 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Health Care Reform: Public Option, Reconciliation, DOA?</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="health-care-reform-sign.jpg" src="http://poliwatch.org/images/health-care-reform-sign.jpg" width="150" height="150" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" /></span>Last night, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/22/rockefeller-not-inclined_n_472393.html" target="blank">Sen. Jay Rockefeller announced</a> he would not likely support a Public Option reform through the Reconciliation process (a process by which different legislation passed by the House and Senate, can be reconciled and bypass a Senate filibuster with 51 votes.) That announcement, for all intents and purposes, spells the death knell for the reconciliation push to pass health care reform with a Public Option. Sen. Rockefeller has been a strong supporter of the Public Option. He expressed his reservations, leaving a bit of room to change his mind, but, it is hard to imagine what would, given his arguments against it. </p>]]></description>
            <link>http://poliwatch.org/2010/02/23/health_care_reform_public_opti.php</link>
            <guid>http://poliwatch.org/2010/02/23/health_care_reform_public_opti.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Health Care</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">health care reform</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">McConnell</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Public health insurance option</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">public option</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Rockefeller</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:12:04 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Bayh &amp; Nuclear Bombshells]]></title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="AP Photo/Alex Brandon, Obama with Bayh.jpg " src="http://poliwatch.org/images/Obama%20with%20Bayh.jpg" width="212" height="201" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" /></span>Two bombshell news stories occurred back to back this morning. Sen. Evan Bayh announces he will not run for reelection, and Pres. Obama announces $8.3 billion in federal loan guarantees for America's first new nuclear power plant in nearly 3 decades. The import and aftermath of these two news announcements strike at the heart of what is broken in American politics, demanding repair, or inviting failure. </p>]]></description>
            <link>http://poliwatch.org/2010/02/16/bayh_nuclear_bombshells.php</link>
            <guid>http://poliwatch.org/2010/02/16/bayh_nuclear_bombshells.php</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">America&apos;s future</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">anti-incumbent</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">bi-partisanship</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Congressional gridlock</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Evan Bayh</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">nuclear power</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Obama</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">voting power</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 13:46:17 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Republicans Have Gone Anti-America</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="GOP Message - Courtesy: Flickr" src="http://poliwatch.org/images/GOP%20Road%20Signs.jpg" width="180" height="240" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" /></span>The Republican Party, also known as the Grand Old Party, or <a href="http://www.gop.com/" target="blank">GOP</a>, has evolved from a very pro-America Party in in 1994, to an anti-America Party through the last decade, taking giant strides in that direction since Americans threw them out of power in 2008. Greed, duplicity, anger, vengeance, and paranoia have taken over the group think psychology of Republicans in Congress, as well as a great many of the remaining supporters of the GOP. It is time the GOP be labeled for what its member's actions demonstrate. <div style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;" class="zemanta-pixie"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/6f5451e3-3ac2-452d-9b93-7de2c2ee641b/" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]"><img style="border: medium none ; float: right;" class="zemanta-pixie-img" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=6f5451e3-3ac2-452d-9b93-7de2c2ee641b" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]"></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script type="text/javascript" src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" defer="defer"></script></span></div></p>]]></description>
            <link>http://poliwatch.org/2010/02/04/republicans_have_gone_anti-ame.php</link>
            <guid>http://poliwatch.org/2010/02/04/republicans_have_gone_anti-ame.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Republican Party</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Status of American Politics</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Congress</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">GOP</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Parties</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Republican Party</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:37:13 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>SOTU. We Don&apos;t Quit. I Don&apos;t Quit !</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<div class="zemanta-img mt-image-right" style="margin: 1em; display: block; float: right; width: 310px;"><a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Obama_Health_Care_Speech_to_Joint_Session_of_Congress.jpg"><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/fb/Obama_Health_Care_Speech_to_Joint_Session_of_Congress.jpg/300px-Obama_Health_Care_Speech_to_Joint_Session_of_Congress.jpg" alt="President Barack Obama speaks to a joint sessi..." width="300" height="200"></a><p class="zemanta-img-attribution" style="font-size: 0.8em;">Image via <a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Obama_Health_Care_Speech_to_Joint_Session_of_Congress.jpg">Wikipedia</a></p></div>The President's <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2010/01/28/us/politics/AP-US-Obama-State-of-the-Union-Text.html" target="blank">State of the Union</a> (SOTU) speech was realistic, mostly accurate, and proscriptive. It was not a "feel good" speech. It accurately summarized where the nation is domestically, divided and behind schedule in addressing many of its most pressing issues. His speech pragmatically stipulated that he alone cannot bring the solutions to pass (a campaign refrain); Congress and the people have to carry their share of the load, the confidence, and responsibility. 

<div style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;" class="zemanta-pixie"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/6cfb367d-04df-451f-a221-9cb9a61d47ea/" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]"><img style="border: medium none ; float: right;" class="zemanta-pixie-img" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=6cfb367d-04df-451f-a221-9cb9a61d47ea" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]"></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script type="text/javascript" src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" defer="defer"></script></span></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://poliwatch.org/2010/01/28/sotu_we_dont_quit_i_dont_quit.php</link>
            <guid>http://poliwatch.org/2010/01/28/sotu_we_dont_quit_i_dont_quit.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Election Issues 2010</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Obama</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Status of American Politics</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:54:46 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Supreme Court: Corporate Influence Over Elections</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court, a conservative court on the belief that money is protected speech as far as elections are concerned, <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34822247/ns/politics-supreme_court/" target="blank">overturned a century of precedent</a> and laws moving in the other direction. Republicans continue to sabotage America, even after being deposed from majority power to rule, via their Supreme Court activist judges. As usual, Republicans say one thing and do the opposite. For appearances they rail against activist judges, all the while appointing their own activist judges to the federal benches. </p>]]></description>
            <link>http://poliwatch.org/2010/01/21/supreme_court_corporate_influe.php</link>
            <guid>http://poliwatch.org/2010/01/21/supreme_court_corporate_influe.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Election Issues 2010</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Status of American Politics</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Supreme Court</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">The Courts</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category"><![CDATA[Voting &amp; Democracy]]></category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Buckley v. Valeo</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">campaign finance reform</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">FEC</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Federal Election Campaign Act</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">law</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Supreme Court</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:08:42 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Mass. Election. Independents and Anti-Incumbents! </title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>For years, I have advocated for independent voters to unite around the ant-incumbent strategy. Pres. Obama won as the challenger to the Bush/Republican years, riding the wave of disapproving independent voters. He won with 53% of the vote, and <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1244239/Barack-Obamas-approval-rating-hits-record-low--hes-popular-African-Americans.html" target="blank">his approval rating</a> remains in that ball park, depending on what poll you look at. The off-year gubernatorial races in 2009 were dominated by anti-incumbent independent voters. And now, in an historically Democratic State, Democrats lost and a Republican shall take the late Ted Kennedy's seat. Are the Parties acknowledging this wake up call? </p>]]></description>
            <link>http://poliwatch.org/2010/01/20/mass_election_independents_and.php</link>
            <guid>http://poliwatch.org/2010/01/20/mass_election_independents_and.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">2010 Elections</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Health Care</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">National Debt</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">2010 election</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Coakley</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">health care reform</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Mass.</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Massachusetts</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Scott Brown</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 10:01:57 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Political Decisions</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Political decisions must, by definition in a diverse society, alienate some in that society. This truism is dictated by the concept of opportunity cost. For those without business school backgrounds, opportunity cost is the cost of not having selected the other choices. Every decision anyone ever makes, carries an opportunity cost. Example: The wife takes the shortest route to work. In doing so, she avoids alternative longer routes which may make her drive more interesting, less hazardous as the lesser traveled routes, or less fortuitous in passing up the opportunity to give Bill Gates a ride after his HumV broke down, which he appreciates with a sizable thank you check of a million dollars. </p>]]></description>
            <link>http://poliwatch.org/2010/01/13/political_decisions.php</link>
            <guid>http://poliwatch.org/2010/01/13/political_decisions.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Education</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Obama</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Status of American Politics</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">decision making</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">education</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">education reform</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">parenting</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">politics</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:31:20 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Obama&apos;s Afghanistan Decision</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Obama's process, approach, and decision on where we go from here in Afghanistan was outstanding. Gen. Petraeus lauded Obama's process and decision as having gathered all of the assumptions, data, and projections and compared and evaluated them in a deliberative and nuanced way which, no other process could have permitted. Gen. McCrystal says he is 100% behind both the number of troops and the time line to begin withdrawal. <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/12/02/2759942.htm" target="blank">Australia and the head of NATO</a> applaud Obama's decision.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://poliwatch.org/2009/12/02/obamas_afghanistan_decision_1.php</link>
            <guid>http://poliwatch.org/2009/12/02/obamas_afghanistan_decision_1.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Foreign Policy</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Obama</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Afghanistan</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">foreign policy</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Obama</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Pakistan</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:04:26 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Health Care Reform Critic&apos;s Refuted</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/01/health/policy/01health.html?_r=1&th&emc=th" target="blank">NY Times reports</a>: <blockquote>The Congressional Budget Office [CBO] said Monday that the Senate health bill could significantly reduce costs for many people who buy health insurance on their own, and that it would not substantially change premiums for the vast numbers of Americans who receive coverage from large employers.</blockquote> </p>]]></description>
            <link>http://poliwatch.org/2009/12/01/health_care_reform_critics_ref.php</link>
            <guid>http://poliwatch.org/2009/12/01/health_care_reform_critics_ref.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Health Care</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">health care reform</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">insurance industry</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 13:57:31 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Senate Vote Moves Health Care Reform to Debate. </title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Last night, in a show of Party unity, Democrats, and two Independents, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/22/health/policy/22health.html" target="blank">voted last night</a> to move health care reform legislation to the Senate floor for public debate. Republicans, to a person, voted to shut health care reform down, before it could be debated on the Senate floor. Regardless of what one thinks of Sen. Harry Reid personally. or politically, this was a victory for him and his skill as majority leader. </p>]]></description>
            <link>http://poliwatch.org/2009/11/22/senate_vote_moves_health_care.php</link>
            <guid>http://poliwatch.org/2009/11/22/senate_vote_moves_health_care.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Health Care</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">cloture vote</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">future health care costs</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">health insurance</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">reform</category>
            
            <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:40:22 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Investing and Politics</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="Capitol-Markets.jpg" src="http://poliwatch.org/images/Capitol-Markets.jpg" width="75" height="75" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" /></span>If folks stowed their money away in fixed rate investments during the latter part of the Bush economy, and then reallocated that money into stock investments for the Obama economy, those folks have to be pleased at having saved as much as a 50% loss at the end of the Bush economy, and approaching as much as a 50% gain during this Obama economy, starting in March of this year. </p>

<p>Of course, President's don't control the stock markets. Myriad factors, most knowable, some not, play roles in the direction of market investments. The trick is to acknowledge and accept the trends without prejudice, political or otherwise. As far back as 2006 and 2007, there were clear indications the Bush economy was going to implode. </p>]]></description>
            <link>http://poliwatch.org/2009/11/18/investing_and_politics.php</link>
            <guid>http://poliwatch.org/2009/11/18/investing_and_politics.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Congress</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Consumer Issues</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Election Issues 2010</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">economy</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">future of American investing</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">investing</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">markets</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">money</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">political market investing</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">politics</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">stock market</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:59:27 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Term Limits: The GOP&apos;s Fake Gesture is Resurrected</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Some Republicans are <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/11/11/congress.term.limits/index.html" target="blank">calling for Term Limits</a> of those in Congress. When you are done laughing your arse off, please continue reading. Term Limits were in the Contract With America, offered by Republicans in 1994. As soon as Republicans acquired the majority in government to enact term limits, the entire issue was never spoken of by the GOP again. Until now, that is. Now, that they are the diminished minority, again. </p>]]></description>
            <link>http://poliwatch.org/2009/11/12/term_limits_the_gops_fake_gest.php</link>
            <guid>http://poliwatch.org/2009/11/12/term_limits_the_gops_fake_gest.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">2010 Elections</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Congress</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Congress</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">incumbents</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">independent voters</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">reelection</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">term limits</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">vote out incumbents window sticker</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:41:39 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>The Stakes Could NOT Be Higher</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Failure in Washington is not an option. America last year finished its long circular journey from 1940 to return to the precipice of national collapse. Unlike 1929, however, instead of taking that next drop off step, we sidestepped along the edge of the precipice, where we still remain today; at the edge. </p>]]></description>
            <link>http://poliwatch.org/2009/11/09/the_stakes_could_not_be_higher.php</link>
            <guid>http://poliwatch.org/2009/11/09/the_stakes_could_not_be_higher.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Democratic Party</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Economy</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Election Issues 2010</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Obama</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">2010</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Democrats</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">political landscape</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">political parties</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Republicans</category>
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:43:16 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>
