Republican - conservative solutions and views.

Angel Flying Too Close to the Ground

Obama supporters are spinning his recent drop in the polls as a response to a few negative comments and ads. Whoddathoughtit? Two or three ads can puncture the Obama hot-air balloon and send the high-flying superstar hurtling back to earth with us ordinary folks.

sheepherd.jpg
Those spinning this tall tale usually have low opinions of the American public's intelligence. Whenever their candidates have trouble, they blame the gullible American people. Evidently, they think that the public can be fooled easily - and inexpensively - by a few Republicans. I am flattered. According to their logic, the buckets of money Obama has thrown into the race, not to mention the Soros/moveon.org millions and media adulation are negated and reversed by a few McCain comments and a funny video comparing Barack Obama to Charlton Heston as Moses. Now THAT is an asymmetrical comment.

The reason Obama has been so evidently easy to deflate is because his campaign is based mostly on hope and hot-air. It has taken longer than anybody thought for someone to point out that the emperor has no clothes, but it is coming clearer.

Now we can have a real debate. The things Obama fans call negative campaigning is merely a reality check. They thought that their man could float above the fray all the way into the White House. It seemed to be working for them, but we cannot let that happen. Obama is just a man, after all, just a politician; he is nothing special. I am glad that Obama will have to compete as an ordinary candidate on his merits.

Obama has been skating on is lack of experience and parlayed that from a serious deficient to a positive benefit. It was a great trick. He was popular precisely because he was a good-looking outsider with little experience and so no record to judge, study or attack. Like Peter Sellers' character in the classic "Being There", Obama is blank screen onto which everyone can project his or her own story. But the longer the illusion lingers on the screen, the harder it becomes to sustain the pleasant fantasy. Obama may have peaked too soon. We are beginning to see the man behind the screen and he is not much to look at.

It is not negative campaigning to bring up legitimate flaws in your opponent. An accurate portrait contains light and shadow, as well as a lot of blank space. This allows people to judge. Perhaps Obama has a little too much blank space. Blank space need not be held against him, but it cannot work for him either.

The Obama campaign reminds me of a classical marketing case I studied in B-school. It explains why a particular dog food was unsuccessful despite a great beginning.

A major manufacturer wanted to get into the pet food business. They designed great packaging, with a superb ad campaign and made all the right moves to attract dog owners. It worked ... at first. The product sold out and the factory geared for the big wave of demand. But it never came. Despite the fine packaging and marketing, the dogs couldn't stomach the product and they were the ones that had to eat it.

As people get to know more about Obama, they find less to like. He says all the right things, but like the dog-food the great packaging doesn't make up for the deficient product.

Scroll Down To Read 8 Comments


Enter Your Response Here

Choices: Sign in will give you a menu for verifying your identity via MT, Vox, Typekey, etc. Stay signed in, and this system will remember you. Anonymously requires name, email, and typing in the letters in a graphic.
(HTML tags permitted)



8 Comments

Expand - Collapse Comment

Interesting article positing that Obama is a new born babe, a tabula raza, incapable of anything yet on his own.

Just a few minor sticking points to this view:

He has 47 years of experience as an American. More than a decade of experience as a Congress person. A professor of Constitutional law. A man whose experience with Americans is based on helping as a community organizer and representative. A person less tainted by the corruption in the U.S. Congress, by far, than John McCain. A man who has rejected corporate lobbyist money and campaign donations. A man who isn't afraid to get his mind dirty with some economics textbooks, unlike McCain who voted to spend trillions of tax dollars in his Senate career without ever opening an economics text book or learning even the basics of this topic or computer skills, or internet, or anything else that has arrived new on the American scene since his war days in Viet Nam.

McCain has no shame taking big Oil money through the RNC and in his many past Senatorial races. And is out there banging the Oil Company's message on the campaign trail, to give them carte blanche to lease and drill where ever they wish to despite the fact that these oil companies are NOT investing profits in new drilling in areas of leases twice the size of Texas on land an in the Gulf of Mexico.

T. Boone Pickens said the solution to our oil dependence CANNOT be solved by more drilling. I will take his experience on the issue over McCain's in a heartbeat.

McCain is out there just like GW Bush was, saying what his puppeteers are telling him to say to sucker the voters into his camp. And McCain's presidency will be as disastrous as the current puppet president playing step n' fetch it for the big Oil, Pharmaceutical, Insurance, and Banking industries, even as these industries ruin our nation's economy and future with abject greed and lobbying in Congress.


Expand - Collapse Comment

David M. Huntwork said at :
2:49 AM, 08 06 2008 | Permalink

For someone who has been involved in politics for sometime he has accomplished remarkably little. His record in the Illinois state senate is abysmal. Bring on the amateurs, and if the Democrats aren't careful, put them in the white house. The polls show a remarkable 'buyers remorse' for a party that should have had this race sewn up by double digits by now.

Expand - Collapse Comment

The polls show a general distrust of politicians, and a good deal of indecisiveness regarding the next president. But, November is politically a very long way away.

Expand - Collapse Comment

It's possible what hurt Obama was Obama himself.
Obama's comments about "Oh by the way, did I say he was black", "he doesn't look like those other presidents on the dollar bill", and other comments are playing the race card. We don't need Barack to tell us these things. By the way, Barack is half white too. But who cares? Why continue to play the race card?

Again, the two front-runner choices in this presidential election stink.

That's why it is more important than ever that voters not forget about Congress.
Regardless of who the next president is, do the voters want to sabotage their president by saddle with the same corrupt, do-nothing Congress?

Expand - Collapse Comment

Obama is not above speaking unscripted and making occasional gaffes.

McCain this last week has abandoned contemporaneous speech. His handlers now have him strictly scripted unless it is before small gatherings with few to no video cameras and sound. Smart move on McCain's handlers.

Expand - Collapse Comment

David R. Remer,
DITTO what you said too.

Expand - Collapse Comment

Testing the 'Reply' link at the bottom of d.a.n's message above. Seems to work just fine.

This will create nested comments, tying threads of comments back to an original comment.

Sounds complicated, but, it is simple enough once some threads get started. It allows one to revisit particular threads to continue the conversation or debate by identifying whose comments are replies to your own.

Expand - Collapse Comment

David wrote: Obama is not above speaking unscripted and making occasional gaffes. McCain this last week has abandoned contemporaneous speech. His handlers now have him strictly scripted unless it is before small gatherings with few to no video cameras and sound. Smart move on McCain's handlers.
I'd prefer they didn't do that, because it is often those unscripted occassions that often reveal things they are trying to hide.