Go To:
Contact:
Polls:
Other Notable Sites
The last of the debates is now history. According to polls, Sen. Obama won each and every one of them. According to the polls, Obama is ahead in enough battleground states to make the Electoral College map his for the next 4 years. Obama put together and ran an immensely successful grass roots campaign. His judgment and decisions in the management of his campaign suggest that he can be an effective president. Why then, the semi-subconscious suspicion that Obama will not become our next president?
- Will the Supreme Court step in again to decide who is president as in the 2000 race that gave us Gov. George W. Bush instead of V.P. Al Gore?
- Will Sen. Obama be cut down by an assassin's bullet before he can be sworn in as was the case with Robert Kennedy, or after his election as was the case with John F. Kennedy?
- Will the voters pull a fast one on the pollsters, refusing to reveal their bigotry for pollsters but wear it on their sleeve within the polling booth on election day?
Or, is America about to acknowledge another major growth spurt and turning of the page in our history book by electing a person of color to the highest office of the land and leaving him there as if he were like any other president in our history who won the election by vote, hook, or crook? I certainly hope so.
I am also hopeful that Sen. Obama turns out to be far more than the voters and his followers expect him to be. To get elected president in the U.S. as an agent of change, the candidate must hold many of their cards close to the vest. Sen. Obama has not provided very many details regarding his policy agenda; just enough to get elected, but not so much as to constrain his actions as a change agent president.
Change can be a scary thing. Psychologists have for decades acknowledged the research that depicts major changes in one's life as anxiety producing, stressful, and even traumatic for many. Sen. Obama's campaign was anchored on the concept of changing the direction for our nation and the office of president. But, just how those changes will be defined, he has largely kept to himself.
Many pundits would say the less a candidate commits to the fewer voters the candidate will alienate. That is a truism of American politics, and no doubt provides some explanation of why voters still have a nagging suspicion that they don't know Barack Obama. I suspect these voters suspicions may be well founded. But, not due to a hidden agenda that will harm Americans or our future, but, which will dramatically improve our nation's future and her political history.
Sen. Obama is highly intelligent, deliberative, and perceptive. He saw what few others could see 20 months ago in the electorate, a longing for change even though change is an exercise in anxiety and nervousness over where one ends up after the changes have taken place. If one looks at Sen. Obama's speeches and criticisms of the current administration and political system, I believe we can see the kind of changes that may come from his presidency. And it is not the American people who need to be fearful, but, American politicians who should be quaking in their boots.
Sen. Obama has pointedly attacked the wealthy corporate interest influence upon legislation in the Congress. That will be a target of the Obama administration. Sen. Obama is acutely aware of the scandals that have plagued politicians like Alaskan Sen. Ted Stevens alleged taking of bribes from an oil company in the form of free home improvements in the 10's of thousands of dollars. Or, Rep. Tom Delay's scandals flaunting state and federal laws to achieve his ends. And of course, Rep. William Jefferson's scandal in a sting operation which found cold cash in his freezer from an alleged bribe.
President Obama will be in a position to become the people's hero and the blight upon the corrupt and incompetent politicians that currently make up the bulk of the U.S. Congress, if the polls are any indication. The Democratic Party leadership may end up hating President Obama as much as the Republican Party, if Pres. Obama attacks the heart of the corruption, campaign financing, gerrymandering of political districts, corporate and wealthy special interest lobbying, and the revolving door to wealth that comes with getting elected and leaving office to work as a lobbyist. All these practices prevent our American government from attending the challenges that face our nation and people.
If Pres. Obama is true to his condemnation of these practices, he will become the people's next Franklin Delano Roosevelt and the pariah of the extant political parties which thrive upon and profit from these corruptions of our political process. And this may just be the reason and rationale for his taking his campaign to the grass roots of the American people instead of relying solely upon the Democratic National Committee for his funding and support.
I suspect Sen. Hillary Clinton saw this writing on the wall in Sen. Obama's rhetoric and why she fought so hard to defeat this change agent who could bring down the corrupt practices and stranglehold on power which both the Democratic and Republican Parties maintain on our political system, to the detriment of our nation's ability to meet the demands of its challenging issues. The Clintons after all, were the King and Queen of the Democratic Party and their positions in that Party depended upon politics maintaining its inside wheel and deal power structure which the Clinton's had become masters at manipulating.
Our current circumstances economically and politically are as dire as those posed by the 1929 Stock Market Crash that triggered a decade long depression and sequence of recessions that destroyed millions of American's lives and ways of living. Sen. Obama is aware of this. And Sen. Obama intends to address these circumstances. And there may be genius in Sen. Obama's avoiding references to FDR, and thus tipping his hand. FDR accomplished what he needed to after his election in 1932 because he had the support of the American people, while Washington insiders despised his tactics, his methods, and his all out attack on tradition and precedence of the past which helped create the Great Depression.
In other words, in the eyes of many, President Obama is poised to tip over the apple cart in Washington D.C. and make criminals of many there now holding elected office by ushering in a mandate of change by the American people to outlaw the current corrupt practices and influence of special interests that prevent legislation from effectively resolving the problems facing our nation, like national debt, deficits, false understated unemployment figures, inflation figures, and wage figures, and energy dependence an a failed educational system which happens to be the most expensive in the world.
The voters may not consciously recognize in Obama what I have written here, but, they have connected to Obama as the candidate to rest their hopes on. At some level, Sen. Obama's allusions to what will be the core of his presidency has been successfully communicated to a majority of voters, though most could not explain it in detail as done here. Sen. Obama has to be acutely aware as well, that his will be a one term failed presidency if he does not chart such a course of reform, change, and modification of the foundations upon which America's challenges are dealt with.
I have high hopes for this Senator as President. More than that. I have confidence in this man whose words, deeds, and management style during his campaign portend a presidency that will, against enormous resistance, alter the course of our future, averting it from almost certain degradation and failure to as the most powerful agent for peace in the world, and most prosperous nation for its people and children to come.





10:38 PM, 10 18 2008 | Permalink
David, I have always thought the vote will be close as the nation is divided in politics but I believe Obama will become the next president. The economic upheaval we are all seeing on wall street very clearly demonstrates to all of us what most already knew, something in this country is wrong, really wrong.
Most understand McCain is not the agent of change this country needs and Palin would be disastrous for this country. Most understand McCain doesn't really understand what the problem is. Those that do not follow politics can see this. We will see a closer race than the polls may indicate as some will decide not to vote for Obama based upon skin color but enough of us will overcome this human failing and will become part of history with our vote.
I hope Obama does turn out to be another FDR as a president the caliber of an FDR is what I believe will be required the next 8 years. I believe the problems that the next president is facing will have greater importance to the future of the people of this country than the challenges FDR faced in the 3 terms he served the American people (Yes I include the depression and the war when I make this statement).
Hopefully Obama is a man for our times and can meet the challenges awaiting him.
Reply to this comment
Roy Ellis said at :
4:06 PM, 10 19 2008 | Permalink
David, quoting you:
“I am also hopeful that Sen. Obama turns out to be far more than the voters and his followers expect him to be. To get elected president in the U.S. as an agent of change, the candidate must hold many of their cards close to the vest. Sen. Obama has not provided very many details regarding his policy agenda; just enough to get elected, but not so much as to constrain his actions as a change agent president.
Many pundits would say the less a candidate commits to the fewer voters the candidate will alienate. That is a truism of American politics, and no doubt provides some explanation of why voters still have a nagging suspicion that they don't know Barack Obama. I suspect these voters’ suspicions may be well founded. But, not due to a hidden agenda that will harm Americans or our future, but which will dramatically improve our nation's future and her political history. “
It’s those rose colored glasses David. You are hopeful!? That one individual could step on the political stage in 2008 and make a significant difference? That’s akin to putting a drop of oil on a gnat’s ass and trying to stretch him/her over a telephone pole. You need to take off those glasses and look directly into Richard Fuld’s eyes. Or take a sunny stroll with Chief, Haliburton alongside the Potomac. Here is some reference: Henry Cabot Lodge on the Spanish American war (1895), “in the interest of our commerce, for the sake of our commercial supremacy in the Pacific we should control the Hawaiian islands and maintain our influence in Samoa…and when the Nicaraguan canal is built, the island of Cuba…will become a necessity.” And from Sen. Albert Beveridge (1900), “The Philippines are ours forever….Senators must remember that we are not dealing with Americans or Europeans. We are dealing with Orientals.”
During the 20’s we had the “Osage Massacre” where oil findings on their reservation earned them the distinction of being the most murdered people in the United States. Dean Acheson (1953) arguing against antitrust: “American oil corporations are, for all practical purposes, instruments of our foreign policy towards these countries.” In 53 the DOS stated: “in the cause of defense and in the fight against communism, the five [US based oil companies] sisters must be brought to Iran” setting the stage for a CIA/British led coup of Iran’s Prime Minister. Alan Greenspan (2007), “ I am saddened that it is politically inconvenient to acknowledge what everyone knows: the Iraq war is largely about oil.” While our losses are tremendous, the Iraqi’s have lost more than 100,000 killed.
Rockefeller IV to ExXonMobile, after their 20 year, multimillion dollar campaign against global warming: “The goal has not been to prevail in the scientific debate, but to obscure it.” From Robert Kennedy,: “95% of Republicans are corrupt and 75% of Democrats are corrupt.” From Judge Robert Bork: “the Supreme Court is now a political institution, not a legal institution.”
So, while I do agree that Obama keeps a neat head of hair and his shoes shined, I’m not ready to hand the keys to the palace to the duopoly again. Our young history has shown that these guys are like the greased pig being chased by kids at the local fair. If the taxpayer/voter doesn’t spend 24/7 trying to keep up with their politicians – they lose. This Sen. Stephens will be the first, and only, Senator reelected to office by 12 jurists in DC. Let’s stop this nonsense, reclaim our sovereignty and constitutional rights, our democratic principles. Let’s put some accountability into the political equation so we don’t have to rely on “hope” that an elected official will perform well. Let's stop this charade, or delusional democracy as Joel calls it. This country is being run by the conglomerates. You know it and I know it. This is the best chance we may have to revolunize unless we have a depression. Let’s:
(1) VOID all non-performing legislator’s from office as was done in 1933 following the Depression.
(2) Stand up new 3rd parties with a different political attitude (they work for us). With built-in citizens’ oversight for elected officials. (They don’t adhere to the reform agenda, they get rejected from the party).
(3) Promote Article V Convention, a powerful tool the founder’s provided for the people, but long denied by unscrupulous legislators. (1) and (2) must happen before we can ever expect AVC to become a reality.
Otherwise, we have the government we deserve!
Roy Ellis | October 19, 2008 4:06 PM
Reply to this comment
David R. Remer replied to Roy Ellis at :
10:59 PM, 10 19 2008 | Permalink
Roy, I commend your stance. But, the simple fact is, this race, for the majority of American voters, is between Obama and McCain.
McCain is a known quantity - and his position on economics and foreign policy and social decay are the wrong ones for what our country needs going forward.
That leaves us with a wrong choice, and Obama whose positions are not detailed, but, whose general economic and foreign policy directions are applauded by the likes of Gen. Colin Powell, former Sen. and still Republican Jim Leach, and Independent Senator Bernie Sanders. Obama's reach across party lines to win support and endorsement is a positive that McCain simply cannot offer. There is reason to be hopeful for an Obama presidency on this basis.
I understand and cannot fault your pessimism, distrust of the duopoly parties, and their history. But, I remain hopeful that Obama will prove to be more the pragmatist than the Democrat, and there are tell tale clues that may well be the case. Our country needs someone who CAN and WILL be elected first and foremost, and who will put ideology aside and feel beholding to no political party ideology in seeking practical and affordable answers to the challenges we face. There simply is no other candidate who meets these criteria.
Reply to this comment
Roy Ellis said at :
8:04 AM, 10 20 2008 | Permalink
And so it will go . . . in 08, in 12, in 16, etc.
Roy Ellis | October 20, 2008 8:04 AM
Reply to this comment