Independent - Third Party solutions and views.

Go To:

Contact:

Advertisements

Bumper Sticker Image

Order your 'Vote Out Incumbents' window - bumper sticker.

Just $3 each. Each order helps Vote Out Incumbents Democracy (VOID) raise funds to spread the message around the country.


Polls:

Other Notable Sites

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by David R. Remer published on September 2, 2008 5:06 AM.

Unintelligence in Federal Intelligence Agencies was the previous entry in this blog.

Palin's Speech and Noonan's Odds is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type Pro
This blog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Palin's Daughter's Pregnancy

It is none of our business. The out of wedlock pregnancy of Gov. Sarah Palin's daughter will be read into for meaning by people in accordance with their own similar, or lack of similar experiences and how they chose to deal with it. But, it has no bearing on whether Sarah Palin would be competent to step into the role of President should McCain be elected and not be able to finish his term of office.

Already some are attacking McCain's choice of Palin on the basis of how home-schooling and creationism biblical teaching have failed to prevent this pregnancy. Others are claiming if Gov. Palin had been a Mom instead of Mayor and Gov. for the last several years, this might not have occurred. But, these critiques of Palin's family problem have no bearing whatsoever on her competence to step into the role of President.

Similiarly, arguments that God is testing Palin's position on reversing Roe v. Wade and legal abortion, or that the sins of the daughter are not the Mother's, have no bearing on the Gov. Palin's competence to govern the United States. That said, voters will vote using all manner of rational and irrational criteria for casting their vote. But, the majority of voters will vote according to two criteria, political party, or whether the candidate is likely to maintain or improve their lot in life, or not.

I personally think voting for the candidate most likely to maintain or improve one's lot in life in America, is the only rational criteria to use. Voting for a political party in no way insures the best candidate, as the presidency of George W. Bush demonstrates amply with his less than 20% approval rating. Most Republican voters in 2000 and 2004 didn't know and didn't care that G.W. Bush was a failure in the oil business, the sports team management business, and got to be Governor of Texas on the basis of his last name and family wealth only. They voted for him because he was Republican and by all accounts, a faithful family man who had found Christ and been 'born again'.

And history repeats itself in this election. Sen. McCain was an average student and rule breaker when in school before the military. He graduated from Annapolis 5th from the bottom of his more than 800 student class. But, his father was a high ranking Admiral or soon to be one then, and his antics and rule breaking and poor academic performance were not going to be permitted to halt John McCain's rise if Dad had anything to say about it. Not dissimilar from former Pres. George Bush and his son.

John McCain's plane aboard a carrier was involved in causing the deaths of many on board that carrier in which a weapon was discharged on deck causing massive explosions of the other planes on deck. Footage shows McCain running from the planes and explosions, as any sane person would do. Whether McCain's actions had anything to do with that lethal day aboard the aircraft carrier, only John McCain knows for sure. The military exonerated him from any responsibility in the incident as he was exonerated for all his misdeeds and poor performance at Annapolis.

This is not dissimilar from the controversy surrounding George W. Bush's absence from military duty without leave as a pilot, which resurfaced during his 2000 presidential bid. His father too was a high ranking official in the Reagan Administration at the time.

Then, despite his many infractions of military rules and poor performance at Annapolis, McCain was given his commission and allowed to fly bombers over Viet Nam, where he was shot down and captured and tortured and where he cooperated with the enemy in making a taped confession of war crimes. There is no question that John McCain was horribly tortured and treated by the North Vietnamese and his refusal to leave his POW status behind before other prisoners who had been there longer, was the source of his heroism and the high water mark of his military career. It spoke to McCain's character in relation to his fellow prisoners upon whom he depended as his only link to the civilized world.

There was a change in McCain after he returned home for a long and very painful struggle to regain his physical strength and capacity again. He came back determined to not let the his treatment in Viet Nam impair his future. Perhaps it was his way of defeating his captors. But, it is clear that from that point on, John McCain was a driven man and he was not about to let anyone stand in his way from getting what he wanted.

This included his wife, who also suffered an injury and lost some of her beauty queen appeal as McCain engaged in an affair with another woman who would become his second wife. McCain has lied about this in public, and proven to have lied by official documents which demonstrate that McCain was involved with Cindy before his divorce. When confronted with this documentation in a taped interview, McCain said it was a long time ago, and his memory of it is not clear.

He did attend the War College after returning from Viet Nam and healing, where he studied the Viet Nam War and its implications. In the taped interview, it appears the only thing he learned there was that America must commit all its resources when it engages in War to insure swift and complete victory. We won't know if that lesson included use of nuclear weapons upon a non-nuclear nation's people until McCain becomes president, because that is not a question he is willing to answer directly.

Having married his second wife, a very wealthy woman, and upon seeing an opening in elected government, John McCain set about getting elected with the same drive and determination which helped him recover from his leg injury that threatened to impair his ability to walk. He spent vast numbers of hours and days knocking on doors in temperatures above 100 degrees, and it paid off along with help from his wife's contributions to his campaign funding.

For more than 2 decades, John McCain has served in the U.S. Congress, voting on trillions of dollars of spending packages and tax legislation, and never once, in all those years, did John McCain consider picking up a book or any formal education in economics. This caused McCain to misstep on the campaign trail this year when Tim Russert quoted McCain's statement made in Dec. 2007 and reported by the Boston Globe and other media at the time. The quote Russert asked him about was

"I know a lot less about economics than I do about military and foreign policy issues. I still need to be educated."
To which McCain replied to Russert in the televised debate:
Actually, I don't know where you got that quote from. I'm very well versed in economics. I was there at the Reagan revolution. I was there when we enacted the first -- or just after we enacted the first tax cuts and the restraints on spending.
It was a classic politician's response, saying he was there when someone else did something, which of course means he was simply alive and in Wa. D.C. when Reagan took economic measures.

By his own words in the Dec. Republican debates, John McCain confessed that his one academic area of achievement and area of human knowledge study was in warfare and hostile foreign policy. And his record demonstrates that this is true. He has not in 40 years stepped into any academic courses for continuing education in law, government, economics, sociology, or even political science. He has utilized, very adeptly, the strings of his Admiral father, the 100 million dollar wealth of his wife Cindy, and his experience as a war prisoner, as his resume for moving up in American politics and government. And he has learned a new trick along the way, forgetfulness.

Pres. Reagan had a medical condition that was responsible for his lapses in memory. Sen. McCain has no such excuse by all accounts, and he knew full well where Tim Russert got that quote from. Sen. McCain has backtracked on a number of his positions and statements since deciding to run for President. It is debatable whether McCain actually forgot how many homes he owns, or was feigning forgetfulness in order to dodge an answer that would make him appear to be out of touch with the American public which owns one home if any, these days.

Sen. McCain has, as of the last month, taken to only speaking in public with a script or note cards. The reason is that Sen. McCain's memory was seriously starting to be questioned as he committed one gaffe after another when speaking contemporaneously before cameras. Among those lapses in memory include:


  • Referring to Putin as president of Germany

  • He said Iran, a Shiite nation, is training and arming Iraqi al Qaeda, a Sunni group. Lieberman finally corrected him after 3 such public statements over the course of 2 weeks.

  • He said he had walked freely through a Baghdad market without body armor highlighting how safe it was, when in fact, photos have him in an armored vest in that Baghdad market and surrounded by military personnel with weapons at the ready.

  • His reference to the cap and trade system as not having mandatory caps.

  • Saying he voted for every Katrina investigation bill, when in fact, he against at least two.

  • His erroneous references to Gen. Petraeus as commander of Middle East operations, when, in fact, Petraeus has been the commander of only Iraqi operations. This from a candidate with a military history? Chain of command is something any Commander in Chief wannabe with a military background should never lose sight of, especially in public.

Then there are McCain's reversals.

John McCain had a long standing feud with Jerry Falwell before McCain realized his campaign was in trouble with the religious right, and mended the fence with Falwell thereafter, despite McCain's distrust of Evangelical preachers like Falwell.

McCain was opposed to off shore drilling before he realized that conservative GOP donors and investors had 100's of millions at stake in oil investments, and then, McCain reversed his position on the campaign trail to 'Drill, Drill, Drill'.

And there is a very long list of other reversals compiled at The CarpetBagger Report. It is one thing to reverse one's position in light of new or better information. It is quite another to reverse a position to pander to constituent voters in order to get elected. The former has the potential of becoming policy. The latter has leaves voters without a clue as to how the candidate will actually act once in office.

To be fair, some of the reversals listed at Carpetbagger Report are likely due to McCain becoming more informed on issues other than conducting war. His education outside the area of how wage war, leaves great room for growth and learning.

The one enormous difference between the Obama and McCain tickets is this. If Obama stays healthy in office, he continues to have Sen. Joe Biden's decades of experience to call upon. If Obama were not to complete his term, Joe Biden's decades of experience steps into the Oval office.

On the other hand, it is McCain who lays claim to decades of experience in federal government and foreign policy. If McCain, who will be oldest president ever elected and has fought off two bouts with cancer, should not complete his term, it is Sarah Palin who would step into the Oval office. And Sarah Palin has no foreign policy experience, no federal budget and tax plan experience, and no experience whatsoever with Washington D.C. government.

In other words, Obama's ticket has decades of experience in federal government either way. McCain's ticket loses that experience almost entirely if something should happen to prevent McCain from completing his term.

Is this reason enough to not vote for John McCain. That is up to each voter to decide for themself. But, one thing is very sure, the pregnancy of Gov. Palin's daughter has no place in this race or as a criteria for deciding which candidate ticket is most likely to improve American's lives and that of their children.

Scroll Down To Read 7 Comments


Enter Your Response Here

Choices: Sign in will give you a menu for verifying your identity via MT, Vox, Typekey, etc. Stay signed in, and this system will remember you. Anonymously requires name, email, and typing in the letters in a graphic.
(HTML tags permitted)



7 Comments

Expand - Collapse Comment

I fail to see the relevance, Sophia, of your comment to this article's topic. But, OK!

Expand - Collapse Comment

There are plenty of other things that raise many questions and concerns, without dragging Palin's daughter into it.

Expand - Collapse Comment

When are we going to stop voting for people we feel are "cool" to hang out with rather than those we aspire to become?

The leader of the country should not be someone you like sharing stories with while having a couple beers. It should be someone people can look up to, well educated, articulate, concise, etc.

When we elect someone with little academic intelligence, the world laughs at us out of the stupidity of the President. When we elect someone who's a failure, the whole country is touted as a failure. The President should carry himself in a way that most people would aspire to become.

By the way, this whole experience thing is such a smokescreen. I'll vote for the guy with 2 degrees from 2 of the most prestigeous and challenging institutions in the world, along with 12 years of teaching constitutional law (the foundation of America)at a world renowned academic institution where he is challenged daily by his students, as well as challenging them over a guy who finished almost last in his class and has sat in senate for 26 years and done hardly anything but collect a check and a lady who graduated from Idaho (are they even ranked in anything???)who's "executive experience" entails being a sportscaster and the mayor of a town with more polar bears than humans.

I'm sorry but I'm sick of the world laughing at our falsely educated (bush snuck into yale), unintelligent, hypocritical leaders.

Expand - Collapse Comment

Vishal wrote:When are we going to stop voting for people we feel are "cool" to hang out with rather than those we aspire to become?
Good question.

ANSWER: Most likely, when these abuses of the past 30+ years finally deteriorate economic conditions enough to cause enough pain and misery for a majority of the voters (40%-to-50% who don't vote; too many who blindly pull the party-lever; too many that fuel and wallow in the circular partisan warfare; too many that elect the candidate that spends the most money 90% of the time, which is usually the incumbents, etc.).

The sooner, the better, because it will take years to deal with the mounting problems that are already in the pipeline.

At any rate, the voters have the government that the voters elect (and re-elect, and re-elect, and re-elect , . . . , at least until that finally becomes too painful).

Expand - Collapse Comment

David, When a candidate for public office supports abstinence only sex education and then discovers her 17 year old unwed daughter is pregant,one has to wonder if the candidate has had an ephipany and has changed her position on the issue of sex education. The ability to reason and use sound judgement is an issue. The ability to see the error of one's public policy is an issue. Pehaps Gov. Palin still believes in her original position, perhaps not. Either way the voters have a right to know.

Second when Gov. Palin decided to bring the daughters boyfriend on the campaign trail then one can only assume she wants to highlight this issue. When does it become our business if not then?

Expand - Collapse Comment

Well, j2t2, your 2nd point is valid and well made. I was not aware that Palin decided to bring the boyfriend on the campaign trail. Given that, she has made her daughter's pregnancy a prominent issue of her campaign for whatever political reasons justified that decision. In my opinion, it reflects extremely poor judgment.

Many have tried to flaunt their errors as strengths, and if she thinks flaunting unmarried sex and pregnancy is going to be a strength for her campaign, one has to question her sense of risk assessment.

As for your first point, I still think it reeks of guilt by association. As a parent, I am very aware of which of my child's actions I am responsible for, and which I am not. Palin is not responsible for her daughter's decision to engage in sex before marriage. All evidence indicates Sarah Palin advised her daughter otherwise. Therefore, her daughter's decision does not reflect upon Sarah Palin's values.

That said, if Palin wishes to make this family matter a campaign issue, then she has to bear the consequences for any all inquiries and judgments by the public that result from it. Political candidates are entitled to some private life especially regarding their family, but, ONLY if they choose to leave their family life off the campaign stump. Palin apparently has decided to bring her family onto the stump as a political tool, and that decision opens wide the door for the public to include her family's private life in their consideration of her candidacy.

Expand - Collapse Comment

Ron Brown said at :
11:51 AM, 09 08 2008 | Permalink

First, Just how do ya get a password that will work so ya can stay signed in? I've tried about 10 and every time it comes up as an unvalid password.
Second, I don't see where Palin's daughter being pregnat has anything to do with how Qualified Palin is to run the country if she should become President.
In fact I think she's more qualified than anyone on either ticket.