Independent - Third Party solutions and views.

Go To:

Contact:

Advertisements

Bumper Sticker Image

Order your 'Vote Out Incumbents' window - bumper sticker.

Just $3 each. Each order helps Vote Out Incumbents Democracy (VOID) raise funds to spread the message around the country.


Polls:

Other Notable Sites

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by David R. Remer published on September 7, 2008 5:21 AM.

McCain: Bush Policy - McCain Fight was the previous entry in this blog.

Deception and Delusion: Dummies for Democracy is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type Pro
This blog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
McCain: Is Black Face Next?

Jolson-McCain for President.jpgSen. McCain has borrowed so much of the Obama campaign's issues and positions in the hopes of stealing away some of Obama's support, that one has to wonder if we will see him next on one knee in black face singing Al Jolson's song, "Mammy" in order to make inroads on Obama's Black supporters.

To be sure, there is borrowing of success in all campaigns, but, what we are witnessing in 2008 is perhaps unprecedented in American history where one candidate co-opts the verbage, the issues, and the positions of huge portions of their adversaries campaign. Obama shifted his position on offshore drilling on the East and West coasts as a stop gap measure on route to energy independence. This was McCain's central plan to energy independence.

Sen. McCain however, took wind farms, solar energy, ocean wave energy, and geothermal energy into his campaign after Obama had made large inroads on the energy independence issue. This despite the fact that Sen. McCain has voted against funding such alternatives in the Senate, presumably to protect oil and gas campaign donor's and lobbyist's main profit source. He even chose a VP candidate who as governor, raised taxes on the oil and gas industry to benefit Alaskans with direct payments from those increases. So, is McCain for or against raising taxes on the oil and gas industry? It is getting hard to tell.

Obama had been making the case all year that that our role in Iraq was costing progress in Afghanistan. This Summer, it appears McCain adopted Obama's script as McCain began calling for drawing down troops in Iraq to build them up in Afghanistan for a surge there instead.

John McCain is trying to get double duty on Obama's Iraq and Afghanistan policy, by now adopting Obama's 16 month timeline as reasonable and saying the cost savings of drawing down the troops in Iraq can help lower the budget deficits. Never mind the fact that McCain is also saying those troops coming out of Iraq will need to go to Afghanistan, and negate any savings along those lines. Not logical, but, any Obama position that will help McCain pick up some of Obama's independent voter following is fair game, apparently.

Sen. McCain would have nothing to do with Jerry Falwell for years as a result of Falwell's disfavoring McCain in a previous presidential bid. After Obama began making inroads to the religious voter base after dropping away from and condemning Pastor Wright's remarks and touting religion as a source of strength and hope, Sen. McCain decided to patch up his differences with the Evangelical Falwell, in order to compensate.

The one constituency McCain has not yet tried to mimic Obama in order to compete for voters, is in the African American community. That is a tough one. But, with McCain's determination to win by any means, it would not be prudent to discount the potential of McCain showing up at the NAACP in black face, singing a few bars of Mammy from the Al Jolson movie

Scroll Down To Read 10 Comments


Enter Your Response Here

Choices: Sign in will give you a menu for verifying your identity via MT, Vox, Typekey, etc. Stay signed in, and this system will remember you. Anonymously requires name, email, and typing in the letters in a graphic.
(HTML tags permitted)



10 Comments

Expand - Collapse Comment

Mr. Remer,

I am not sure I understand your use of the race issue in this article. Are you suggesting that McCain is about to make a play for the African American vote? Are you suggesting that he is about to compete with Obama for their vote by suggesting he understands their wishes and needs better than Obama does?

If so, and he does ask for their support by representing their interests, is that the same as putting on shoe polish and singing Mammy to the African American voters?

Perhaps you can help me understand your intent with this article in using the race card.

As for McCain and Obama having similar positions on the issues, that seems to me to become apparent only as Obama's positions become known and events change (like in Iraq) which lead both candidates to the same conclusions, like the Surge was successful in ending violence in Iraq.

McCain's positions on most of his policy issues have remained the same as far as I can see, with only a few exceptions.

Expand - Collapse Comment

LA Hanna, putting on black face was an obvious gimmick for Al Jolson, a novelty that helped him get noticed. It is akin to McCain's adopting Obama's campaign on so many issues and policies in order to increase McCain's vote popularity. Like the black face, it is so obviously a sham.

McCain isn't going to go after lobbyists and wealthy campaign donors supporting the GOP and the GOP agenda. That is a flat out lie. That would be McCain cutting his own political stature and Party off at the knees. McCain doesn't do anything unless it benefits McCain. His life story is one of a rebel who goes after what he wants and to hell with the rules, the laws, and the people that might be hurt by it.

Look up the Keating 5, for example. McCain was the only one of the 5 with a direct investment conflict of interest, yet he received the least reprimand. This is a wheelin' dealin' man whose one lapse of true character was in Hanoi Hilton when he was shamed into staying rather than be released early by the suffering of his own prison mates. And he has milked that lapse of usual character for every possible ounce of advantage he could possibly squeeze out of it.

To this day, he can't give a speech, an interview, or a casual conversation without recalling his heroism and suffering. Real heroes don't wear their heroism on their sleeves and shine a light on it at every possible opportunity.

He is on tape lying about divorcing his first wife before taking up with Cindy. Documents date his divorce papers after he had taken up with Cindy. This is not something one forgets. It is a flat out lie. When confronted with it, he now says he doesn't remember dates that long ago. B.S.

What we have here is a very determined opportunist who lost one bid for president, almost lost this second by reckless management of his campaign funds, and now he insists he is the one to rescue our economy? Give me a break! I ain't buying it. And shame on McCain for trying to sell this horse hockey to the uninformed and those uninterested in the truth and facts. Integrity? I don't think so. A man in search of a legacy to vindicate his misdeeds in life, is more like it.

Expand - Collapse Comment

Marcie G. said at :
8:03 AM, 09 08 2008 | Permalink

David, thanks for the humor as I head out to work. You give me something to spread around in the rumor mill at the water cooler at work today. McCain in Black Face to steal Obama's voters. I love it. :-)

I too think he would do it, if he thought it would help him win. The more I learn about his past, the more I distrust what he says on the campaign trail, and the better Obama appears as the only choice to make for America this year.

But, then, I am a Democrat.

Expand - Collapse Comment

It is crazy how the McCain camp is trying to steal Obama's strategies!!! More proof that they have nothing new or exciting to say.... they are more of the same and are content to trash Obama and then use his strategies..hope yall smarter than they give you credit for!!!!!!

I am registered as an Independent. I am voting for Obama!!!!

BEEEZO'S BRAIN - politics, commentary and news

Expand - Collapse Comment

GREAT ARTICLE, COULDN'T BE TRUER. HOW CAN MCCAIN SERIOUSLY COMPLETELY SWITCH HIS CAMPAIGN WITH ONLY 2 MONTHS LEFT? BETTER YET, HOW CAN PEOPLE BUY THIS CRAP? BARACK HAS RUN THE MOST INNOVATIVE CAMPAIGN IN US HISTORY.

IMAGINE WHAT HE COULD DO FOR AMERICA.

I JUST GOT BACK FROM EUROPE, THE SAYING THERE IS: "ONLY IN AMERICA WOULD THERE EVEN BE A DEBATE ABOUT A MAN LIKE BARACK BEING PRESIDENT, PLEASE SEND HIM TO US IF YOU DON'T WANT HIM"

LETS NOT MAKE THIS MISTAKE AMERICA

Expand - Collapse Comment

Viyer06,

The answer to your question, how can people buy this crap is complicated to answer.

Many white women can buy it because their agenda is focused on a putting a woman in the White House. Many white rural folks for whom the confederate flag still holds great symbolism, can shoot themselves in the foot in order to avoid putting a dark skinned person in the White House. Still others can buy the crap because they were trained to dismiss and diminish anything labeled liberal or progressive, and vice versa for that matter.

But, the main reason the American people are developing a history at this time for really BAD political choices like reelecting GW Bush, is due to a lack of education in the most basic fundamentals of politics and democracy.

In our schools we teach who you vote for is so very important. That is false, and 180 degrees opposite of what our founding fathers understood when adopting a democratic form of republic. Who you vote for is nowhere near as important as who you vote out of office.

Politicians will insure they stay in office without anyone ever voting. They will vote for themselves and stay in office if no one else votes. The power of the vote is not to reelect, but, to unelect. When government fails the people, as our government has in a myriad of ways these last 8 years, the logical thing to do is to vote for a challenger to the incumbent running for reelection.

It is after all, the incumbents who are responsible for the government that has failed us. These incumbents were either corrupt, incompetent, or at the very least, ineffective in making government what we expected. Therefore, the logical choice for voters is to remove these incumbents by voting for ANY challenger. To reelect incumbents is to reelect the very people responsible for the poor government the voters suffer under.

But, this is NOT what is taught in our schools. And so, this most basic fundamentals of democracy is lost on the vast majority of voters in America who reelect the same politicians at a rate of 90% or more, no matter how bad government becomes or is.

Obviously, this is not by accident. From the School Boards to the White House and Supreme Court, the power brokers know the lessons being taught in our schools and they have every intention of preserving what is being taught, that voting for a candidate is the most important decision one will make. Which of course is literally false. It is who you vote out of office, and not into office, that ultimately determines whether government improves or not.

There is no incentive for politicians to improve government at any cost to themselves as long as they can blame the other politicians for the wrongs done the voters and people. If on the other hand, 50% or more of incumbents lost their reelection bid each election, both the remaining incumbents and the new Freshman politicians would recognize that their political career is likely to be next on the chopping block if they don't put their personal and partisan concerns in the back seat, and put the voter's and the people's objectives in the driver's seat.

Democracy is one of the toughest and most complicated forms of government on earth. It demands intelligent, informed, and educated voters who understand this most fundamental of democratic principles, that the power of the vote is to remove politicians from office, not keep them in office. When government fails the people and the nation, the vast majority of voters logically should vote for any challenger.

That is how you improve government by giving incentive and motive to the new politicians to perform better than the politicians they just replaced. But, as I said, the power brokers don't want this lesson taught or promulgated in our schools. It is not in their political interests to have intelligent, informed, and educated democratic voters. Quite the opposite in fact. And so it is, as it is.

Expand - Collapse Comment

haha with our country in shambles, "republican" should almost be a swear word.

Gotta love the polls not taking into consideration the 10's of MILLIONS of 18-29 year olds setting out finally vote this year. McCain camp thinks these polls are right on the spot, that this is how the election is going to turn out.

Please, campuses all over the country are blasting with students finally voting, and most of them are voting Obama.

Every campus you go, Obama's campaign staffers are there recruiting more and more students to register. I walked across campus once and saw at least 35 obama staffers registering students, not to mention the inordinant amount of obama merchandise flaunted all around campus.

I can't wait for the slaughter, the 18-29 year olds will not be left out this year, they will dominate the political landscape. Top university officials, almost all being liberal, are advocating intensely for students to vote. Signs are everywhere, banners hung up all over, obama campaigners on every street corner of every campus registering students and welcomming them to adulthood. Showing, rather than preaching (like the GOP), that these students voices will be heard this november 4th. That this is one of the most crucial elections in American history and that these students have the chance to make a difference for the first time. Oh and they will.

Its going to be worse than hiroshima on november 4th. And those of you, as well as the polling companies, not taking into consideration the younger generation are vehemently mistaken on your analysis of the election.

Expand - Collapse Comment

Viyer06, Ssshhh....!

You are giving the November Surprise away.

Don't ruin it for Republicans.

Yes, that has been a problem with the polling since the beginning of this year. Hillary's campaign failed to appreciate the youth vote, and lost to Obama who has nurtured and courted that cell phone constituency which can't be contacted by the pollsters who use fixed land line phone numbers of residences.

That is not to say, McCain can't win. But, the polls have to remain in his favor by a spread of at least 4 points plus the margin of error to compensate for the polling inaccuracy that will show up on election day, when the only poll that counts is counted (Diebold machines excepted of course).

Expand - Collapse Comment

Please Watch this video and tell me what you think...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yiurw9T5p_s

Expand - Collapse Comment

Bob Jones, the video is a clever mix of truth and pure propaganda. There are blatant fallacious statements such as Carter turning Iran from an ally to an enemy. Iran chose that path for themselves. The worst energy crisis?

I don't think so. What we are witnessing today with the export of 100's of billions of American dollars overseas for oil, never to return and circulate in our economy, that is the worst energy crisis America has seen.

But, it is clever inasmuch as uneducated and ignorant people believe what they see with their eyes and believe what they hear with their ears, as if sight and sound manufactured by other people must represent the truth.

America responded to propaganda like this in support of GW Bush in 2000 and 2004, and now Republicans won't show Bush's name or say his name at their Convention due to the shame of having fallen for their own propaganda. Propaganda hid the truth from Nazi Germany's leaders, and they utterly and completely destroyed their own nation with their own propaganda. America is following a similar path.

America cannot and will not, except by serendipity, elect the best and most capable leaders because of the propaganda designed to prevent such persons from being elected, or even choosing to run in the first place. America's highly developed propaganda machines, through which billions of dollars are funneled each election cycle, are destroying America's future.

That is what I think of the video.