Working Poor Unready to Revolt
Once upon a time when governments no longer served most of their citizens it was the most economically disadvantaged that could be counted on to rebel against tyranny and injustice. Times have changed, for the worse, despite the spread of democracy.
Here we are with a two-party plutocracy that preferentially serves corporate and wealthy interests and lets the middle class suffer and sink. Plausibly, the middle class is unready to revolt because it still maintains a relatively good standard of living despite rising economic insecurity. But what about the lowest 40 percent of Americans that are the working poor?
A recent survey of this group by the Washington Post, the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation and Harvard University conducted this past June looked at the beliefs of adults ages 18 to 64 working 30 or more hours a week, not self-employed and who earned no more than $27,000 in 2007. The results show a fascinating dichotomy. Though there is widespread pain and discontent there is also a stubborn faith in the American dream despite little help from government.
Ninety percent of this group sees the current economy negatively, either not so good or poor, with 52 percent feeling financially insecure and 50 percent feeling less secure than a few years ago. The fractions saying they have difficulty affording basic things are severe, including: 88 percent that cannot save money for college or other education for their children, 82 percent paying for gasoline or other transportation costs, 81 percent saving money for retirement, 65 percent paying for health care and health insurance, 65 percent handling child care, close to 60 percent paying credit card bills, monthly utility bills and rent or mortgage costs, and 47 percent buying food. Three quarters say it has gotten harder to find good jobs and nearly that fraction for finding affordable health care, and 68 percent finding decent, affordable housing.
In the past year this group has had to take many actions to make ends meet, including 70 percent that cut electricity use and home heating; 62 percent that took an extra job or worked extra hours, 51 percent that postponed medical or dental care and 50 percent that took money out of savings or retirement funds.
All this sounds pretty bleak. But are these people mad and pessimistic? Not exactly.
An amazing 69 percent are hopeful about their personal financial situation, 59 percent believe they are more likely over the next few years to move up in terms of their social class, 59 percent believe that their children will have a standard of living much or somewhat better than theirs, and 56 percent think they will achieve the American dream in their lifetime.
Do these lower economic class, hardest hit Americans that account for 25 percent of the adult population believe that government helps them? No. Only 22 percent believe that government programs are making things better for them. But apparently they have bought hook, line and sinker into Barack Obama's change rhetoric, with a 2 to 1 margin favoring him over John McCain. And when it comes to beliefs about which candidate will do better for them the margins favoring Obama go up to 3 or more to 1 for improving their own financial situation, the national economy and the national health care system. Similarly, Obama is seen as much more concerned with their needs and better represent their values. All very good news for Obama, except that only 70 are registered to vote and about a third saw no difference in whether Obama or McCain was in office.
Faith in Obama, however, pales in comparison to the other source of comfort for dealing with hard economic times. A striking 78 percent find religion or faith in God helps them get through tough economic times.
The unmistakable conclusion from all these data is that no rebellion against the power elites running the two-party plutocracy seems likely. If the bottom 40 percent of Americans in terms of income still believe in the American dream and change-spouting politicians like Obama, it is hard to believe that the more affluent middle 40 percent of the population are ready to support more radical change through political rebellion.
Interesting how gasoline prices are dropping as we approach the Republican and Democratic conventions and Election Day. Apparently, America's ruling class knows what it is doing. It can keep channeling more and more of the nation's wealth to the rich, Upper Class producing more economic inequality without fearing the kind of political revolution that Thomas Jefferson thought the nation needs periodically. Consider this: In the three decades after World War II household inflation-adjusted income of the bottom 90 percent increased 83 percent compared to 20 percent increase for the top 10 percent. In contrast, in the past three decades, the bottom 90 percent saw only a 10 percent increase while the top 10 percent received an increase of 232 percent! The two-party stranglehold on our political system has produced rising economic inequality.
Forget all that nonsense about the proletariat. Most Americans use their faith in God or religion or conventional politicians to cope, even in some of the most insecure economic times in American history. They remain overly confident in voting as the path to change. The ruling class has successfully used propaganda to dumb down and manipulate most of the public because delusion has become the opiate of the masses.
In God and Barack Obama We Trust could be placed on all our currency if the views of millions of Americans are taken seriously. Don't you feel better?
[Joel S. Hirschhorn can be reached through www.delusionaldemocracy.com.]





Expand - Collapse Comment
d.a.n said at :
10:05 AM, 08 09 2008 | Permalink
Voters obviously are not yet feeling enough pain to question their voting habits, and to stop repeatedly rewarding bad politicians with 85%-to-90% re-election rates, despite a dismally low 9% approval rating for Congress.
True, since most obviously still believe that repeatedly rewarding bad politicians with perpetual re-election is the solution, despite simultaneously giving dismally low 9% approval ratings to Congress. And simply letting the two-party duopoly take turns running the nation into the ground isn't working, is it? True. It is delusion, fueled by apathy, complacency, ignorance, blind partisan loyalties, distracting partisan warfare, irrational fears and hatreds, greed, and laziness. We truly only have ourselves to thank for all of it. In a voting nation, an educated electorate is paramount, and too many voters have doomed themselves to get their education the hard and painful way.But, perhaps enough voters will get sick and tired of wallowing in the petty partisan warfare, and be less apathetic, complacent, and blindly partisan when enough of the voters are deep in debt, jobless, homeless, and hungry? After all, in year 1933, 3+ years into the Great Depression, unhappy voters finally ousted a whopping 206 members of Congress. Too bad the voters have forgotten that lesson, and choose to learn the hard way again.
At any rate, the voters have the government that the voters elect.
d.a.n | August 9, 2008 10:05 AM
Reply to this comment
Expand - Collapse Comment
David R. Remer replied to d.a.n at: :
4:04 AM, 08 10 2008 | Permalink
d.a.n said in response to Joel in his article:
I don't disagree that voters are deluded. But, you attribute their delusion to their own intrinsic character flaws. That I do disagree with. The delusion has been propagated and finely honed by the political parties with over 2 centuries of experience and expertise at propagating the delusion amongst the voting public.
Voters care. If they didn't, they would not vote. Non-voters are irrelevant when it comes to governance and elections. The question to ask is who is feeding the voters the delusion that the political parties are their friends empowering their voice with a throng?
That is the delusion, and the political parties themselves as institutions are the culprits, not the voters, who are unwittingly beguiled by the party propaganda.
Reply to this comment
Expand - Collapse Comment
3:55 AM, 08 10 2008 | Permalink
Joel, Obama is not the problem. If he is elected or not, that is the people's choice and democracy in action.
It is important to separate the results of problems and the causes of problems. You do rightfully identify the source of the problem, or imply it clearly, the political parties themselves.
About half or a little more, would say political parties are their friend and empower their voice. This, of course, is not rational or logical at many levels, but, it is the prevailing view. Devise a way to alter this prevailing view, and the path to better government and a better future for American citizens will be possible.
I just completed an article on this very topic over at Vote Out Incumbents Democracy (VOID). It is entitled, What is Non-Partisan?
Perhaps I will cross post here in a day or two.
Reply to this comment
Expand - Collapse Comment
8:49 AM, 08 10 2008 | Permalink
BTW, Joel, you've written a very fine article here, touching on many of the salient factors as to why the working poor are not ready to for a revolution at the polls.
Mike Gravel has much to say on this topic as well, pointing out how representative democracies are all governed by elites who have become self-serving, as opposed to public serving. Only in Switzerland, I believe it was, did Gravel state that the people truly took the power of governance for themselves in a more direct democracy.
He likens our citizenry as adolescents striving to become mature responsible adult voters but within a political system hell bent on keeping them adolescents. There is merit to some of his arguments and views.
Reply to this comment
Expand - Collapse Comment
Roy Ellis said at :
9:54 AM, 08 10 2008 | Permalink
Joel you wrote: “Though there is widespread pain and discontent there is also a stubborn faith in the American dream despite little help from government.”
The middle class and near or below poverty level are the result of long standing policies by the duopoly. The situation is little different around the world. Recall that the U.S. and world bodies are always going to save the poor in Africa. This is no more than codeword for dumping a lot of money on corrupt heads of government in exchange for access to their natural resources. Europeans want fishing rights, we want tantalum for manufacturing electronic components, etc. Not so much about the poor. You have to ask why things are what they are in this country. Why does it now take two family members working to support a family? Why is a 1950 dollar only worth a dime today? Why did Congress go ten years without raising the minimum wage? What is the effect of printing money on demand and faking the CPI figures to devalue that same money once it is in hands of the middle and poor classes?
It’s true the Democrats have long propagandized themselves as the party of the people. And lots of poor people are bent to vote that way. A single political party is not the culprit. It is the oligarchy, the Shadow Government …..why am I relating all this to you….it’s all in your book, Delusional Democracy! Well, I’m posting to other readers as well. So, the poor and the middle class are easily controlled by the oligarchy but only at a level of pain they will accept. The oligarchy has squandered trillions of taxpayer dollars since WWII. Give $1.5B to Mexico for their corrupt officials instead of putting US workers to work building a fence with that money shutting and simultaneously shut out drugs that drains more billions from this country, etc. The oligarchy has just gone crazi to break the back of the poor and middle class i.e. the Iraq war, jobs to China, outsourcing, defense manufacturing to the EU, etc. How is it possible that our education system is remarkably less than it was 50 years ago? We have a shortage of 60k nurses and the government plans to bring in that number of Philipino nurses to fill the shortage. Last year 40k qualified students applied for a nursing curriculum and was turned down because THEIR WEREN’T ENOUGH FACULTY TO SUPPORT THEM. And so it goes. Status quo as you like to say. Talk about the poor class being distracted or having little hope!!! I can post an article here, there, and everywhere calling out for REVOLUTION or REFORM and basically get ignored. Not just with the poor these conditions exist. Well, we are looking at $65T debt and the old money machine can’t perform it’s magic much longer. A look at inflation eyewash charts exemplifies that very well (d.a.n. hint-hint)
Here is a quote from a “quote to ponder” on HMT’s homepage:
Civil disobedience, that’s not our problem. Our problem is that people are obedient all over the world in the face of poverty and starvation and stupidity, and war, and cruelty. Our problem is that people are obedient while the jails are full of petty thieves, and all the while the grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem.
~ Howard Zinn
Here is an excerpt from one of Jeanette’s post on HMT re “Are we Bankrupt yet?” by CNSnew.com :
Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) asked the Congressional Budget Office to determine what the tax rates would need to be to cover federal spending at that level. (($53T of debt))
"What they told me was really startling," said Ryan. "They said that the current low rate, the 10-percent bracket for low-income Americans, would have to go up to 25 percent. The middle-income tax rate for middle-income Americans would have to go up to 66 percent, and the top rate, which is what small businesses pay, would have to go to 88 percent.”
Doesn’t sound good for anybody, poor, rich, or in between. We should all hope we can hang on the Status Quo a little longer.
Otherwise, we have to government we deserve.
Hardball - 8/10/08
Roy Ellis | August 10, 2008 9:54 AM
Reply to this comment
Expand - Collapse Comment
d.a.n said at :
7:51 AM, 08 12 2008 | Permalink
Joel is one of the few people that blames the voters, instead of only blaming politicians. And why shouldn't he, since it is most voters who repeatedly reward bad politicians with perpetual re-election ?
And why do most voters giver Congress 9% approval ratings, but 85%-to-90% re-election rates?
At any rate, the voters have the government that the voters elect.
d.a.n | August 12, 2008 7:51 AM
Reply to this comment
Expand - Collapse Comment
David R. Remer replied to d.a.n at: :
10:29 AM, 08 13 2008 | Permalink
I don't have any problem with the rich remaining rich, provided they pay their fair (equal percentage) taxes as the lower middle class do in taxes. I couldn't agree with your agreement with Warren Buffet on this issue, more.
But, the resistance in Congress to a flat tax rate for all, is enormous and growing. Which of course, means, it is the right way to go.
You gotta admire American political capacity for avoiding the right thing to do. It is afterall, unprecedented unless you go back to the historical record of the demise of Ancient Rome.
Reply to this comment
Expand - Collapse Comment
Roy Ellis said at :
12:15 PM, 08 14 2008 | Permalink
This nipping around the edges of reform with a different taxation program or modified SS, or pushing thru FOAVC, or etc. will not get us very far very fast. In the news this morning that the white race will become a minority around 2040-50. The white race has held steady at 200M since about 1950. I think each of us agree that voter education is key to political change. Thus, the longer we delay major reform of government and the political system the exponentially harder its going to get. The Blacks and Hispanics will cling to the Dems for social programs. The white race will be split into several factions thus preventing any kind of reform movement. I believe hope for reform can be lost as early as 2012 IF the duopoly is able to citizenize the 10-20M illegals and get them to the polls. I can imagine the whites going to the polls and voting out all incumbents within their power and the Hispanics preventing their favorite amnesty minded representatives from getting voted out thus putting them in senior positions within congress. I’m on board to try and VOID them but I also want broad reform carried out. Unless we start with new, clean, political parties with built-in citizen oversight nothing much is going to change and any changes achieved will be very short lived.
Otherwise, we have to government we deserve.
Roy Ellis | August 14, 2008 12:15 PM
Reply to this comment
Expand - Collapse Comment
d.a.n said at :
9:00 PM, 08 17 2008 | Permalink
When history books are written about the fall of the United States, they should include this article, The Great Consumer Crash of 2009.
I'm not convinced things will bottom-out as soon or as suddenly as year 2009, because things take longer to unfold than many realize (2012 is more likely, because the government will delay the collapse by creating more money out of thin air, and even give away more money if necessary in the form of more stimulus checks and tax cuts, which will make things worse in the end).
At any rate, the voters have the government that the voters elect.
d.a.n | August 17, 2008 9:00 PM
Reply to this comment