Democrat - liberal solutions and views.

Go To:

Contact:

Advertisements

Bumper Sticker Image

Order your 'Vote Out Incumbents' window - bumper sticker.

Just $3 each. Each order helps Vote Out Incumbents Democracy (VOID) raise funds to spread the message around the country.


Polls:

Other Notable Sites

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Paul Siegel published on October 16, 2008 7:28 PM.

Senate: looking ahead & party balance was the previous entry in this blog.

What is an American? is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type Pro
This blog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
 
Civil Politics

This sounds like a contradiction in terms. If you want to win - and nothing is more important than winning - then you must do everything to denigrate and ruin the reputation of your opponent. This nasty politics has been with us for a long time. However, yesterday's debate between John McCain and Barack Obama proves that nasty is not always the best approach. Nice guys finish first.

All the journalists, pundits and commentators said that McCain was angry and Obama was calm, that McCain was throwing insults and Obama deflected them. that McCain's face kept changing colors as his frustration grew and Obama was unperturbed. This is why they claim Obama "won" and McCain "lost." A superficial look may bring you to this conclusion. But Obama "won" for a more important reason: he emphasized civility.

McCain followed the tried and true approach of Atwater and Karl Rove - the Republican approach. The Republican approach may be summarize with one word: "Attack." Distortion? Yes. Smear? Yes. Lies? Yes. Character assassination? Yes. Whatever it takes. To paraphrase an old expression everything is fair in love and politics.

Michael Seitzman summarizes the Republican approach neatly:

Mccain and Palin and their ilk don't laugh. They patronize. They don't smile, they snicker. They don't debate, they denigrate. They don't talk, they condescend. They don't argue, they ridicule. There is a nastiness, a mean-spiritedness, a smug certitude, and a profound and baseless arrogance seething from both of them. These aren't leaders. They're not even grownups. They're not a team of mavericks, they're a team of schmendricks (Yiddish. Means someone who can't succeed but thinks he can. Also means penis).

From the very beginning Obama was urged to attack. When Hillary unleashed some bad attacks, he was again urged to attack. He resisted. When McCain went wild with attacks, he resisted. When Palin was chosen, all the Republicans were excited because here was someone who loves to attack. And attack she did. Obama resisted.

Friends of Obama are still encouraging him to attack. But by now he has proven that his civil approach works. The same people who were encouraging McCain to attack are now saying that he "lost" because he attacked too much. No, McCain did not "lose" because of his wild accusations but Obama "won" because of his civility.

As Obama says we can disagree with each other without being disagreeable. Obama has introduced us to civil politics, a politics that will make all our other interactions more civil. Just what we need.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Scroll Down To Read 1 Comments


Enter Your Response Here

Choices: Sign in will give you a menu for verifying your identity via MT, Vox, Typekey, etc. Stay signed in, and this system will remember you. Anonymously requires name, email, and typing in the letters in a graphic.
(HTML tags permitted)



1 Comments

There was a time when I though McCain was more honest, fair minded, and had more integrity.

Not anymore.

  • McCain lies about taxes (which are regressive, and McCain wants to make them more regressive, but McCain isn't very good in math, and was 894th in a class of 899);

  • McCain lies or spins (or is clueless about) economic conditions;

  • McCain lies or spins Iraq (John McCain said General Petraus could drive about Iraq in unarmed HUMVEEs, which is false);

  • McCain once supported term limits, and then flip-flopped (as usual);

  • McCain calls others socialists when McCain also voted for the biggest bail-out in world history;

  • McCain also despicably pits American citizens and illegal aliens against each other for profits , votes , and (supposedly, but severely misplaced) compassion (and also voted for the first shamnesty of 1986);

  • One of the few things McCain was honest about was admitting (on NPR in 2005) to "looking the other way";

McCain is going to lose the election, which is good.

Unfortunately, it's not a huge relief, since Obama also despicably pits Americans and illegal aliens aginast each other for votes , profits , and (supposedly, but severely misplaced) compassion.

Both Obama's and McCain's voting records and positions stink, but John McCain's stinks worse.

Thus, this election, voters are faced with trying to decide which pile of crap stinks worse.

At any rate, the voters have the government that the voters elect (and re-elect, and re-elect, and re-elect , . . . , at least until that finally becomes too painful).