Go To:
Contact:
Polls:
Other Notable Sites
So by now those on the txtmsg list got the message early this morning: "I have some important news that I want to make official. I've chosen Joe Biden to be my running mate." It's official: It's Obama/Biden
i've been watching the morning talking fringe elements this morning. Besides the non-stop cut to the cameras staked out at Biden's Delaware home waiting for a glimpse of the VP candidate, all three of the cable news stations (CNN, MSNBC and FOX) have all been saying the exact same thing: Does this choice by Barack expose his weakness in his own abilities? Then they cut to McCain's latest ad that basically says the same thing.
Hmmm... i wonder how they all arrived at the same script?
So what are they talking about? For the past number of months, what they've been complaining about Barack is his perceived lack of experience. Well, then it makes perfect sense to go after Biden, doesn't it?
We forget that the modern VP choice is all about going after a specific demographic. Biden will help in going after the Hillary supporters; he'll be able to help with the senior citizen vote and he'll help in some of the southern belt.
Objectively it makes sense: Obama needed to squelch the naysayers by saying he didn't have enough experience and he did it by choosing Biden. It wasn't because he had a weakness; it was because he was smart enough to help his ticket.
Change and Experience: 2008





Expand - Collapse Comment
RickIL said at :
9:03 AM, 08 23 2008 | Permalink
John
I just turned on CNN and the first thing I heard from Blitzer was, has Hillary been snubbed in this whole process and an ad from McCains campaign showing Biden denouncing Obama's abilities and reinforcing McCain. Right now though it looks as though the main focus is on Hillary and whether or not she was slighted and what sort of effect his choice will have on her supporters. Of course CNN started this Hillary build up yesterday in anticipation of Obama's choice. I guess it must be imperative to have some news worthy controversy even if it means creating it themselves.
I think in the total scope of things Obama made a very good choice. Rather than go with a geographical or gender related choice he simply went with the person of experience that can help him in his presidential duties the most. I am glad he chose an avenue of responsibility rather than one of convenience.
RickIL | August 23, 2008 9:03 AM
Reply to this comment
Expand - Collapse Comment
d.a.n said at :
12:04 PM, 08 23 2008 | Permalink
I figured it would most likely be Joe Biden.
Joe Biden has been in Congress for 36 years (since he was age 30; the minimum age required), the longest-serving U.S. Senator in Delaware history.
That's more than McCain's 26 years.
I still don't know who I'll vote for president, but one thing is for sure. No one in do-nothing Congress is getting my vote.
Many in Congress have been in Congress of a very long time. Is it working ?
d.a.n | August 23, 2008 12:04 PM
Reply to this comment
Expand - Collapse Comment
12:21 PM, 08 23 2008 | Permalink
Rick:
i'm amazed at the effectiveness of this cable press to regurgitate whatever the RNC engine decides is the talk of the day.
They keep playing the same McCain ad and bring up the Biden video during the debates. When was that video taken? During the debates.
Where are the vids of Biden saying that Biden has spent a lot of time with Barack and said that Barack has learned significantly since then. Biden also was one of the biggest supporters of Barack's latest overseas trip.
Why are they playing that? Because the RNC didn't tell them to.
Reply to this comment
Expand - Collapse Comment
David R. Remer replied to john trevisani at: :
11:05 AM, 08 24 2008 | Permalink
John T.
Why? The media has an obligation to put out what both camps give them. Isn't it a bit hypocritical to expect the media to accept what only one political camp gives them for coverage?
Reply to this comment
Expand - Collapse Comment
Mark Anderson said at :
10:40 PM, 08 23 2008 | Permalink
A quick comment about the choice. It's hardly responsible to pick an old white guy rather than a woman. When McCain picks Hutchison things will get very interesting. The responsible thing to do is to win and with this choice that makes it harder to do.
Mark Anderson | August 23, 2008 10:40 PM
Reply to this comment
Expand - Collapse Comment
David R. Remer replied to Mark Anderson at: :
10:41 AM, 08 24 2008 | Permalink
Mark, wouldn't it be foolish for McCain to pick Hutchison? He already has Texas without question. And Hutchison's voting record with Bush is equal to or better than McCain's 95% of the time.
Hutchison has no economic skills to bring to the ticket which McCain is in desperate need of. Seems to me, McCain has no choice but Romney who can potentially bring the States of Mich. and Ohio into the camp and who has corporate management and finance experience, as well as gubernatorial experience with budgets and state economy.
Reply to this comment
Expand - Collapse Comment
10:52 AM, 08 24 2008 | Permalink
John T., Biden was a logical choice.
This is a political race in the U.S. of A. I don't understand your dismay at the RNC and McCain camps trying to get every advantage they can from the media, the internet, and airwaves, by putting out anything that might hurt Obama's chances and help their own.
Nothing, absolutely nothing unusual in this.
McCain however, now has a real problem. His logical choice is Romney, and Romney/McCain are on record with thousands of feet of video tape embracing the failed economic policies of GW Bush. Romney can't do for McCain what Biden is doing for Obama, shoring up the weak spot in experience.
If McCain chooses other than Romney, he loses the name, the looks, and experiential record of Romney. If I were you, I wouldn't worry too much about the media's response to all this.
The polls show the majority of Americans prefer a Democrat in the White House. Unless those numbers change, I would relax.
Hillary and Bill can be counted on, out of self-interest, to do all they can at the Convention for Obama. Anything less will jeopardize Hillary's position and future in the Party.
Reply to this comment
Expand - Collapse Comment
3:50 PM, 08 24 2008 | Permalink
David:
For me, in modern politics the logical choice is the choice that brings votes; one that goes after a specific demographic or special interest group. i think the Biden choice is different.
Obama in choosing Biden says that the he's hiring for his team. To me it's saying that he's preparing for his job by getting the strongest members for his team. Biden has significant experience in foreign affairs and is well liked on the hill. Biden can act as the perfect ambassador on the hill for Biden's agenda.
Reply to this comment
Expand - Collapse Comment
David R. Remer replied to john trevisani at: :
9:17 PM, 08 24 2008 | Permalink
John, don't you think it is just a bit naive to think that Republicans are going to yield to Biden because of his experience, rather than obstruct him every inch of the way because he is "The Democratic Administration" ?
Biden will add to Obama's team in reaching out to the public and moderate and liberal Democrats in Congress. But, I simply do not see how McCain's losing will mean anything but hard line opposition to the Obama administration and every single individual in it. And therefore, I don't see Biden adding anything to bipartisanship in Congress, regardless of his efforts in that direction.
Reply to this comment